|
Condensed History
When did you
first hear about Fluorocarbon fishing line …… 2000, 2004, 2007?
The original idea that fluorocarbon could be developed into a
fishing line was actually hatched way back in 1966 by a Japanese
chemical engineer working for Kureha, Japan. This engineer
realized that Fluorocarbon was less absorbent then monofilament
and very dense making it sink faster and not absorb water like
monofilament. An added bonus in the eyes of the original
developers was that its opaque look would not refract light and
be much less visible especially when silhouetted against the
sky.
Kuhera, Japan International
Patent
Kuhera,
Japan applied for and was granted an international patent in 1969. Note that
the patent was international and not just Japanese. Fluorocarbon
was also in the development process for many other uses by
Kuhera, Japan. Development for fishing line and leader ended up
being put on the back burner for more important company
projects. Through the 1970’s and 1980’s Kuhera, Japan continued
to work through the inherent problems of Fluorocarbon like knot
strength and compatibility between sizes and inconsistent line
strengths in various diameters. Much of the development of this
product was accomplished with the aid of the Japanese commercial
fishing industry.
In 1995 Kuhera,
Japan through its distributors licensed sale of a few brands of
the original product to be sold in the US as Big Game Leader
material. This new material in larger pound test sizes cost up
to $1 per foot but anglers still bought it anyway because it was
a proven fish catcher. From there the legend of Fluorocarbon
fishing line and leader grew by leaps and bounds.
Am I Using Real Fluorocarbon?
The popularity
and price was bound to attract the attention of profiteers.
During the early 2000’s suddenly came a flood of Fluorocarbon
“blend” variations of the original. Large US fishing tackle
distributors were selling Fluorocarbon lines and leaders coming
in from Germany, Italy and even private labeling these “unknown”
lines to take advantage of the growing reputation of the
original. The rip off sales skyrocketed and the reputation began
to suffer because much of this new stuff just didn’t work like
the original.
If you have
ever tried Fluorocarbon or Fluorcarbon blend and you were not
impressed then there is an excellent chance that you were not
even using the original patented product and there is an even
better chance that it wasn’t even Fluorocarbon. The fact is that
most Fluorocarbon fishing line and leader available in the US
today is not the genuine Japanese internationally patented
product. That’s because there are only a very few companies
worldwide that are licensed to sell the real thing.
How can you
know if you are using the Real McCoy? In this country our
fishing products are required to have the country of manufacture
printed on the label. If your Fluorocarbon says “Made in Japan”
on the label then it is most likely the original. If it doesn’t
then you really have no way to even be sure that you are fishing
with Fluorocarbon.
|
 |
|
 |
|
As a general rule I can
tell you that the original product should be amber
in color and appear cloudy and opaque. |
|
If you see Fluorocarbon
leader that looks or is advertised as clear or any
other color, it is a good bet that it is not made
under the original patent. |
I actually
began using Fluorocarbon leaders back in the early 90’s and I
can tell you that after twenty years of using them that there
really is a major difference in catch ratios. For many years this
material was my own personal secret weapon. Now I
want to share it with you. You owe it to yourself and your trout
fishing when making line and leader comparisons to use the real
thing and not get fooled by a market flooded with imitations.
|